Monday, September 20, 2010

Why the Great Plains are Great Once Again

Why the Great Plains are Great Once Again


Newsweek

How heartland cities like Fargo and Omaha became the nation’s new boomtowns.

By Joel Kotkin

On a drizzly, warm June night, the bars, galleries, and restaurants along Broadway are packed with young revelers. Traffic moves slowly, as drivers look for parking. The bar at the Donaldson, a boutique hotel, is so packed with stylish patrons that I can’t get a drink. My friend, a local, and I head over to Monte’s, a trendy Italian place down the street. We watch a group of attractive 30-something blondes share a table and gossip. They look like the cast of the latest Housewives series.

It might sound like an evening in the Big Apple, but this Broadway runs through downtown Fargo, N.D. A decade ago, this same street was just another unremarkable central district in a Midwestern town: bland restaurants, adequate hotels, no decent coffee. After the local stores closed for the day, the street was mostly populated by a few hard-drinking louts.

That has all changed, part of a transformation that foreshadows the growth of the vast Great Plains region. “I come from a big city, but I like the lifestyle here,” says Marshall Jackson, an African-American who played football for the nearby University of Minnesota, Crookston, and now works for the local Audubon Society. “In a decade this place will be a small Minneapolis. Everyone sees a bright future ahead.”

Jackson may be an anomaly in this still homogeneous state—the population is more than 90 percent white, and Native Americans constitute the largest minority by far—but he senses something very real. Throughout the good times and, more important, the bad of this new millennium, the cities of the plains—from Dallas in the south through Omaha, Des Moines, and north to Fargo—have enjoyed strong job growth and in-migration from the rest of the country. North Dakota boasts the nation’s lowest unemployment rate—3.6 percent in May, compared with the national average of 9.7—with South Dakota and Nebraska right behind it.

The trend has been particularly strong in urban areas. Based on employment growth over the last decade, the North Dakota cities of Bismarck and Fargo rank in the top 10 of nearly 400 metropolitan areas, according to data analyzed by economist Michael Shires for Forbes and NewGeography.com. Much of that growth has come in high-wage jobs. In Bismarck, the number of high-paying energy jobs has increased by 23 percent since 2003, while jobs in professional and business services have shot up 40 percent.

That’s not bad for a region best known by East Coast pundits for the movie Fargo. It got so bad a decade ago that even local boosters suggested North Dakota jettison the “North” to make the place seem less forbidding. Two Eastern academics, Frank J. Popper and Deborah Popper, predicted that the region would, in a generation, become almost totally depopulated, and proposed that Washington speed things along and create “the ultimate national park.” Their suggestion: restock the buffalo.

Certainly, many small towns across the plains—such places as Reeder, N.D., which lost its only school, or Mott, N.D., with its struggling downtown—have withered. Others are likely to disappear altogether. But growth has rebounded in larger towns, according to Debora Dragseth, an associate professor of business at Dickinson State University. She describes places like Fargo—with a population approaching 200,000—as “sponge cities,” absorbing population from rural areas. Just a decade ago, those people fled the region entirely.

The primary drivers of this new growth, says Dragseth, are basic industries like agriculture and energy. Salaries may be low by coastal standards, but so are living costs. And the prices of commodities like beef, soybeans, and grains have generally continued to rise, due in large part to growing demand from China, India, and other developing countries.

But the biggest play by far is in energy, including coal, natural gas, and oil, which exist in prodigious quantities from Texas to the Canadian border. Besides the vast reserves of oil that have made it the country’s fourth-largest producer, North Dakota possesses significant deposits of natural gas and coal, as well as huge potential for wind power and biofuels. These industries are drawing hundreds of skilled workers from places like California and Michigan, who are moving into Bismarck, the state’s capital, and towns to the west.

The energy boom has placed states like the Dakotas and Texas in an enviable fiscal situation. Oil and gas revenues are filling up their coffers, allowing them to eschew the painful cutbacks affecting most coastal states. North Dakota has a $500 million surplus, and next year the cash gusher could rise to more than $1 billion, estimates Dragseth. That could go a long way in a state with barely 600,000 people.

Of course, the people of the plains have seen booms before—commodity prices soared early in the last century, and there was an oil-fired boom back in the 1970s. But growing demand in developing countries could sustain long-term increases of energy and agricultural products. Niles Hushka, CEO of Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, a growing engineering firm active in Bismarck, sees other factors working for the plains. The public schools are excellent; the Dakotas, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Kansas enjoy among the highest graduation rates in the country. North Dakota itself ranks third and Minnesota fourth (after Washington, D.C., and Massachusetts) in the percentage of residents between 25 and 34 with college degrees.

Nowhere is this potential clearer than in Fargo, which is emerging as a high-tech hub. Doug Burgum, from nearby Arthur, N.D., founded Great Plains Software in the mid-1980s. Burgum says he saw potential in the engineering grads pumped out by North Dakota State University, many of whom worked in Fargo’s large and expanding specialty-farm-equipment industry. “My business strategy is to be close to the source of supply,” says Burgum. “North Dakota gave us access to the raw material of college students.”

Microsoft bought Great Plains for a reported $1.1 billion in 2001, establishing Fargo as the headquarters for its business-systems division, which now employs more than 1,000 workers. The tech boom started by Burgum has spawned both startups and spin-offs in everything from information technology to biomedicine. Science and engineering employment statewide has grown by 31 percent since 2002, the highest rate of any state.

These jobs, and the people they attract, shower cash on Broadway’s busy bars and dining establishments. Both Burgum and his ex-wife, Carole, have been driving forces in this restoration. Carole led the effort to convert the once seedy Donaldson into a stylish downtown hotspot, featuring the work of local artists on the walls and bison on the menu. “People thought I should be put in a padded cell for doing this,” she says. Of course, entrepreneurs like the Burgums will continue to face big challenges to lure customers and workers—cold weather, isolation, and competition from more urban places. But for the first time in generations, parts of the Great Plains have a chance to be great again.

109 comments:

  1. Myles Patterson
    4th period

    It's great to see a place like that get back to a status of prosperity. It shows that small towns and less well known places and can still thrive and maintain business. The country as whole experiences ups and downs as time passes, and so do certain areas of the country, because different areas have different climates and other conditions that differentiate its economy from other regions. Now that the Great Plains are "back in business", let's hope that they will stay that way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AJ Baath
    6th Pd.
    I believe that any city has the potential to grow into a metropolis. Didn’t America start as an empty expense of land save a few native tribes? If the right idea is presented, great things are then possible, and then the magic happens. I wouldn’t be surprised if New Jersey suddenly became less…well you know. Microsoft took a magic bean to Fargo, planted it, and watched it sprout into the booming city it is now. The cycle of business is random and unpredictable, one day you might see Fargo…the next day it’s a meat processing plant. A really bad meat processing plant made with bricks from New Jersey.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ATTENTION...there's problems with school email. I have been unable to receive any school email from home since mid-day on Sunday. I had an appointment and had to leave after school today so I was not able to get to many of the ones that were posted from Sunday. I will have them all done tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's great to see that there is significant growth in industry and population in part of our country. Since we are in a recession, any kind of growth or positive information regarding the economy is reassuring to Americans. Hopefully, the Midwest can become a source of employment for thousands of Americans who are looking for jobs. I think that this is something to look forward to and encourage.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Its good to see that people aren't just moving to the big cities anymore. We [as a country] can't just have a few really dense areas where everything is at, and open unused land everywhere else. It's also good to see that industry is also moving into these growing areas. But what we see here is a few successful cities, most of these cities fail before the get one name brand store. Others just reach a max in development and can't grow any larger to incorporate other goods and services. It will be interesting to see how these few successful cities develop and turn out over the years.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find it very good that the middle upper region of the U.S. is having a business boom. Ever since 2008 everyone has been scared that we wouldn't be able to get out of the recession. This right here does in fact show that we are getting out of it. This population growth in the upper region will also effect it's import/ export system. Having more people allows more jobs too. Isn't more jobs exactly what our president wants too? I think that it is great that all of this is happening.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why are boomtowns so great? Last week everybody was praising the environment, "OOH. A car that's good for the environment! Who cares if it's only 40 miles of good for the environment!" Now it's, "I love industrialization, so much air, water, and light pollution" ??!?!?!?!? What happened? I like the country. Urban areas stink! Literally! You guys need find your own opinions, not just mooch off of the opinions of the writer.
    3rd period

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's sad to see one area is almost overpopulated and another is a ghost town. That’s why we need to spread out some more, give each other some more breathing space. But if North Dakota did become a ghost town, I would be in favor of that super giant national park plan. North Dakota has become so big that even Microsoft bought the rights to the Great Plains in Fargo to set up their new HQ, than you know that North Dakota has been reborn into a thriving society. It's almost as if this whole thing just sprang over night.

    Marcus Levine
    4th period

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jay Shah
    6th Period
    I think it is very good that for once the part of the US that is paid little attention to is growing. I asked my brother what he thought was the least educated state by college grads and he said he thought it was either Alabama or North Dakota. After I told him how high up North Dakota actually was, he changed his guess to South Dakota instead, which I doubt is too low. I like how people are changing their attitude about the country and rural side of the country, and I am looking forward for it to make even more of a growth. I just can't wait until this booming business type thing gets down to the South and the other parts of the US so we can end this recession even faster.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Eby Lukose 3rd PeriodSeptember 21, 2010 at 7:39 PM

    All my life I've thought that some of the mid-western states (including North Dakota) were 'nobody states'. And a decade ago, they were. It's good to see that this is changing. This shows that the U.S., as a country is moving forward. Pretty soon, a lot of 'nobody states' will become well known states like Texas and California. This will also help our struggling economy because more people will move to these states, creating more jobs and opportunities. I think that these cities' success will have good outcomes for everybody.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It surprises me to hear the not as many people are moving to the city. I mean, I knew this would happened eventually that more people would move to urban areas, but I didn't think in this decade. This provides more chances for a better less costing lifestyle, a better job perhaps, but it does increase more risks of violence. The more people in a room has a better chance of a fight (in this case the more people moving in urban areas). I'm afraid to see how long the peace is going to last in all these areas in the future.

    6th Period

    ReplyDelete
  12. First thing I noticed, this post is really long. Anyways, when I read the title, I thought it would be about preserving the wildlife or some other nature-related topic. It is actually about the exact opposite, which is still okay. The Great Plains has been "urbanized" and new jobs are available, which helps a lot in our economy. But, usually when I think of the Great Plains, I think of a vast landscape of green scenery and roaming animals. Now it's becoming just another city in our large country.

    Daniel Thai
    Period 5

    ReplyDelete
  13. Fifth Period
    I think that it's not right to change the Great Plains. America already has its big cities. There's Chicago, New York, Houston, and many, many other cities. And all of these cities are huge and pretty urbanized. If all of America's cities were to be super urbanized, then I think that it would be a total eco-friendly disaster. Big cities tend to use a lot of power and create a lot of wastes. If every city was to be like that, then what would be of the environment? The Great Plains are great for its naturalness. If we build up big cities there, what's next? A skyscraper in Yellowstone? I don't think that America needs the urbanization of the Great Plains.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that industrialization in the urban area would do good to many people such as giving jobs. In this economy jobs are limited and with new jobs coming there will be a better future. I know that this could be bad for the environment, but it can help alot of people too. If we become more green than I think that industralization and the earth can live peacefully.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Charlene Sigua
    Period 4

    It does sound good that there's going to be another city, but I don't really think so. "Great Plains" makes me think of a large grass land and many animals, not a big city. I'm not saying they shouldn't do this because there are going to be new opportunities and jobs. It's just that when I was a child and my teachers taught me about the Great Plains, they would usually say something about how vast the grassland is, not a big city. So really, I don't think that America should change the Grand Plains.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mackenzie Krus
    6th Period

    I think it is absolutely absurd to change the Great Plains. U.S.A already has a lot of big and working cities. Chicago, New York, Houston, and many others. All of these cities are big and urbanized. If all of these cities were to be urbanized, then I think that it would be a very eco-friendly disaster. Also, when I think of "The Great Plains" I think of a lot of land and apparently there are many meanings. When I think of The Great Plains I think of a big landscape of green scenery and wild animals. Now, it's just another city in our large country.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Jae Phan 4 Pd.

    I have lived in coastal states all my life, usually in or next to cities such as Los Angeles and Houston. Before I moved to Texas, all I knew was that is was part of the Great Plains. I was expecting a vast landscape full of cattle and wheat, maybe some rural towns,(cowboys too). I was a little suprised to see big cities such as Houston and San Antonio. Due to this experience, I am not suprised about the Great Plains, everything eventually changes for the better ir fir the worse. Hopefully this change will be for the better..

    ReplyDelete
  18. Jae Phan 4 Pd

    Another thing I want to add, imagine the work benefits for the unemployed. So many new jobs for new cities. This will be great for America. the home of newfound life.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 5th Period.

    I completely disagree with the idea of the Great Plains being urbanized. To be honest America already has big cities, a lot of them. So there is really no point in making more cities. States like Montana, is probably one of the states with the most land. So people don't care to go there. So I definitely think it's a bad idea to urbanize the Great Plains.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 3rd period

    I think its great that a small town is now thriving. That proves that people are moving everywhere and not just to big towns. I honestly thought this article was going to be about the wild life being restored or something like that. Its good that there is now another great urban city in our country.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Joseph Asthappan
    Period 2

    I think that it’s great that their are boomtowns in the west now that means more famous people to come here and more different kind of people. But won't there be more illegal immigration from Mexico to the United States? The boomtowns would have a lot of different kinds of jobs and plenty of people looking for employment, but one kind of people would be the Native Americans if they made a casino, they would become very rich. Also the schools would be a very good deal, if they are good schools with smart students in them then it would be pretty famous and popular because the parents who eye to eye and compare the schools and see if their kids are qualified for that school and if they were then a lot of children would go their and support the school thus making it more and more popular that would be something good in a boomtown or near it to attract more attention.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Nick Brouwer (period 2)September 22, 2010 at 7:31 PM

    I have conflicting ideas on the urbanization of towns. Its good because the economic boom that will undoubtedly occur in such areas will help the nations economy. On the other hand, states like North Dakota are known for their beauty, but will this change once more cities are urbanized there. It could go either way. Of course, just because cities become urbanized in a state, doesn't mean it will change. Take Texas for example: Houston is the fourth largest city in the US, San Antonio is seventh, Dallas is ninth; and Austin, Fort Worth, and El Paso are in the top 25; but Texas still is widely unurbanized. Its hard to not be conflicted on this because of the pros and cons of urbanization

    ReplyDelete
  23. Katie Snyder (2nd period)September 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM

    I think that this is great for these little town, the sudden shift in the economic status, but what will our country become if we make everywhere like Manhattan? We will be like the jungles in Africa and South America, but we will be the concrete jungle. I Love big cities, but what will happen to our agriculture? What will happen to the country side, and the little town that you visit on a road trip? And think about when there is a disaster in a small town. They all have to go to the small neighboring town. Without that other small town, there will be over population, homelessness, and the unemployment rate with go up. In all, I think urbanizing is good, but you don't want to do it too much. we still need to remember what we are building on top of.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Logan Gloster
    Period 4

    I think it is good that small towns are starting to populate and boom considering the unemployment percentage in America. This boom will lead to better lives for people in need, but affect our environment. Beautiful land is being changed into gray cities smelling of pollution and cold hard business. I honestly think they shouldn't get rid of beautiful land for cities to further destroy and pollute our earth. Almost everything good comes with a price; I hope people realize that when they dig up perfectly good landscape.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mishi Jain
    period 2
    I think the urbanization of small towns has pros and cons. Some pros would be that when a town/city gets urbanized there wil be new companies and new jobs for people so very few people will be unemployed. It would also bring many new oppurtunities for the people. Some cons would be if those small towns got urbanized is that we wouldn't have much land and beauty left. We already have so many United States cities that are urbanized so I think that we should have some vast lands full of green grass just for the beauty factor. That would be amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think it’s good that people are moving into small towns. I think this will help the unemployment rates will go down because they're better opportunities there. There aren’t any jobs for anyone in the economy today. I think this will play a role in the world today. They shouldn't take away what we have because everything is valuable in its own way.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Deara mayo
    5th period

    I think it's great that people are moving into small towns. There will be more people working so the unemployment rates will go down.But with most small towns comes beautiful fields,and forests,and flowers. Those will destroyed trying to build new buildings for jobs. I kind of disagree with the Great plains being urbanized because America is pretty big.There are alot of cities already so there really isn't a need for more.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Jade Martin
    4th period

    Many people like living in a big city better than living in the counrty for various reasons. They think that the country is boring and just filled with farms but that's not always the case. Small towns have close knit communities and people help you when you need help. Plus the country has lots of beauty that is covered up by all the buildings in the city. Urbanizing a small town would take all that away. I think that everyone should just wait and see how things happen before they actually take action.

    ReplyDelete
  29. 5th Period

    Big cities and towns seem to define America. The one thing that I am glad to see is that for once that fact might not totally be true. The small towns that have been around for a while have begun to make a come back and actually contribute to the growth of the economy. It is nice to see the small towns grow and prosper and to see these same little towns actually make it in the world today.. I am glad to see the small towns make their mark on the great map of the United States, because it begins to show the diversity of this nation. One way to grow is to become diverse. When we spread out and have these towns become more like the big cities, we gain experience that can only help these towns.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Jenny Chang
    Period 5

    With a growing town there comes a downside. Because of the increasing population and industry, more and more natural resources will be used. At this rate, those places would soon run out of natural resources. When this happens, people will be seeking out more rural places for their natual resources.

    ReplyDelete
  31. 3rd
    I think that it is great that people are starting to realize that small places can be just as great as big cities. If you think about it the smaller places will not be as crowded and busy as the big cities. But I hope that this doesn't become a problem because then all those small great places will become big cities and get overcrowded and poluted by all the people.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Many states have the potential to hit a booming growth, it just has to do with the economy and civil status of the country. Because of the job market many populations of small cities in the country will be growing in population. Although not many immigrants or natives from other countries may not exactly live in these small cities it also grows the population of largge cities. Which would mean some of the larger cities will begin to lose residents.
    Kiah R.
    3 period

    ReplyDelete
  33. Chris Bready
    period 6

    It is very interesting to watch certain towns build up. Every town has its ups and downs. This just tests how the people in the town get through it. It's nice that they compare themselves to the Big Apple.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It is pleasant to know that the middles upper region of the US is doing really well in Business. Since 2008, people have been in fear that the US economy would not catch up on track. This article shows that our situation is getting better day by day. If population increases the number of jobs required will also increase. Barack Obama is trying to take initiative steps towards providing more jobs. The current situation makes me happy; its always better to know that we are coming out of the recession.

    ReplyDelete
  35. 5th
    I think it's great that even in this day and age where technology is key, a small, desolate city like Fargo can become so much larger with a little effort. But it is very interesting how a small city can become a booming metropolis with the energy industry. The fact that Microsoft invested in this small city to operate its business on was also a very smart move. I'm surprised other companies don't try to do the same thing and revolve a city on a successful product. It's great that America is continuing to "expand" in a sense.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Cody Hajek
    3RD PERIOD

    I think its great that this small town can get back to the way it used to be. However I don't think that every town should be like this one. To many of these kinds of towns would ruin the uniqueness of them which would then they would lose there attractiveness. Which in turn they would lose there business and overall there economy would go down the drain. I think urbanizing is good, however to much of it is bad i mean we need to think of what we are building it on.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Lloyd Farley (2nd Period)September 25, 2010 at 8:38 AM

    With our economy in a rut it is exciting to see that we are making a comeback. I’m glad that we get to see more of these small cities grow and become even more prosperous. Even though this can be looked at as a great thing there are also flaws. I read an article about the wild horse population being driven out because of housing developments. It seems like the influx of population is contributed mostly by yuppies (young urban professionals) which means that it may just be another trendy place to live.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anthony Chenevert
    2nd Period

    Many people have different views about city life and country life. Most people are very stereotypical about the country life. Most people think its just work. In the middle of no where. No one can truly understand the beauty of the country. People think that moving into towns can help employment rate, but its actually making it more crowded.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Saimol Edaparampil
    3rd period
    I think that industries being established in areas like the Great Plains is a good thing. But it is also bad because there is going to be more air pollution because of the growth of industries in places other than the big cities in America. It will also take away the beauty of most small towns that have miles of plains and open fields. But hopefully it will turn out to be for the good our nation.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Michael Brennan 3rd periodSeptember 25, 2010 at 9:17 AM

    Well it's good that America is still growing even if we don't know it because we think those places are nowhere. It sounds like the type of people that enjoy trying new things are getting bored with the atmosphere of big towns and have moved in to the middle of the country to meet new people and new things. Also another advantage of moving to a less industrial area is the cleanliness of it with pure air, trees, and animals that where naturally there to start out with haven't migrated.

    ReplyDelete
  41. It is relatively pleasant to see that a significant number of people are migrating to cities. Future statistics show that there will be more people working in the coming years pressing down the unemployment rates. When new buildings and plants are set up, our old farms forests and greenery will be washed out. It is like the two sides of a coin; it upholds advantages and disadvantages. According to my opinion, some of the land should be used for cultivation while the rest should be taken for commercial purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Economists have considered industrialization as a charm of luck as it provides numerous amounts of jobs. Certainly, availability of more jobs would strengthen the declining economy to some extent. From an environmentalists view, this will not be of super high priority as the nature is harmed in course of this process. On a cumulative scale, a large number of people are helped by this movement. We must live green and as well try to balance the economy based on a healthy stand.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think that this can be a good thing or a bad thing depending on what we do with it. If we start crowding together in urbanized cities then it will become very crowded and unpleasant. If we have a reasonable amount of people moving to places like these and others making food for us to eat in rural areas then it will be okay. If every farmer thinks they can get a better job and life in a urban city than we would have a major food shortage. As some have said we need to spread out because earth is a colossal place and we should utilize it and spread out. The city major cities of today are going to become less important as a new decade comes around and new things are going to be found and researched.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Kenneth Pranoto 2
    I think that the Great Plains should be great has problems to fix. One example is that where in the United States we're going to have farms. The important great thing about Great Plains is that there are going to be better jobs and more jobs, so I think is how you want to think of it if it's bad or good.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Andrew Guilbeau
    3rd

    I think it's great that places like this are getting up to speed on economical growth. Small towns like this definitly deserve to hit economical booms like this every once in a while. These small towns should be able to benifit from their attractions. I believe this type of economical spending could help boost small towns everywhere. Big cities get to much credit for being overpopulated and poluted. These small towns should get credit for being a nice place, not because you can easily blow money there.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Sean Nelson
    3rd Period

    I think that it is good that these northern towns are booming and starting to develop. It's good to know that these rural cities and towns can thrive in times of need like what we are in now. It shows that there is still a lot of room to grow in America. I think that rural areas are a good place to live because of their openness and fresh air.

    ReplyDelete
  47. KAYLAH MOORE
    PERIOD 2

    It's awsome that small towns have an increase in jobs and other opportunities; we did just get out of a recession. But some bad things about the urbanization in small towns is that it can cause excessive traffic. And it may even take away some of the natural beauty of the town. All this urbanization could take away and create oppurtunities at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  48. This boom is typical every time a nation is facing a tough time ahead. Many people panic and want a new start at life, and they look to rural and lonesome places to start again, especially in places where few individuals there are prospering. It happened to Texas and California, and now it is beginning in these places where few people dwell on one of the most prosperous places that not only has large amounts of space, but as well as other things like oil. These can attract more people to start a new life with a bang, which is for the better of that individual. Though other places are struggling, it has been known that cities will run out and have to start off with a fresh slate again.
    -3rd Period

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dawud Waddell
    2nd period
    In this day and age technology is the key to life. Without amazing things couldn’t happen, like a small town like Fargo turning into something so busy. Even though nothing is impossible it’s amazing how that something likes that was possible, and if it’s possible there than its possible anywhere like New York or Houston even though were already big we could be larger.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Carolyne Lu
    Period 3

    I think there is an up side and a down side to the urbanizing of Fargo. It's good that they are growing as one and that they're becoming what they've always wanted to be. However, what if some people liked Fargo as a rural location? Nowadays practically everywhere we go are cities and very few rural areas. Fargo was unique because of that, and now the uniqueness is being ruined. But, if that's how the people like it then so be it. It's great that they're trying something new.

    ReplyDelete
  51. John Moore (6th period)September 26, 2010 at 4:23 AM

    I agree with the comments about the number of large cities and how it is nice to have the smaller towns. But life is about change. Whether a small town becomes larger or smaller is partly based on how it handles change. If the farmer never changed to use tractors, he would not be able to compete against the farmer who did. It is the same with industry, schools, etc. How we adapt to technology defines us. Great Plains has a wide variety of software programs. Microsoft bought it based upon the type of businesses it could connect with, not the city it was in. But, because they bought it, the city had to change to grow with the growth of the business. This helped reduce unemployment and added to other businesses growth. If the people do not change and help the city grow, then people coming to the city will not enjoy it and will eventually leave. Everything changes. Do you see the growth of a city as an easy change that all the citizens enjoy?

    ReplyDelete
  52. Dylan Allotta
    5th

    I think all of it's pretty cool. Unfortunately it's sad to see the natural habitat of the land go, but in some places of America, the population density is very high. By expanding into unpopulated areas, people are able to spread out and enjoy life more. If you look at the facts, America is a growing country with a growing population. Not only from reproduction, but also form immigration and life expectancy numbers rising. If we don't start expanding into areas like this, people will be too crammed together. We already see this in some places like overcrowded schools, streets, restaurants, and even stores. It's important that we expand in order to accommodate Americas growing population. Although it is unfortunate to loose places like this, I'm sure if there were to be a vote, Americans would choose to have their space.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Amita Batra
    3rd Period

    This type of industrialization is great for the economy and might just be the key to getting out of this recession. However, I do agree with Ryan about how this industrialization can attract people and the populations of cities will grow exponentially. This will be very uncomfortable and everyday life will be hard to get around.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Richard Kimbrell (6th)September 26, 2010 at 9:25 AM

    I think that this is a very good thing. This small towns are a part of our lives. They always have this nice and friendly welcome to them when you stop there. Many people never leave the these big cities to go out and actually stop in a small town. These places are unique and its good to see them getting on the map. On the other hand the small rural towns shouldn't try and be big like the other cities because then the will eventually just become a big town just like Houston and nobody will want to come visit them anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Samantha Martin
    4th period

    I think that urbanizing rural areas is not a good idea. When more people collect in a small town more jobs will have to be created and though it is great that the unemployment rate will drop, more cities will be created. I mean seriously we have enough cities in this country already we don't need anymore. If you really think about it some of our best organic food products and other things we find in our stores are from rural areas because they keep traditional farming methods. I wouldn't want to take that tradition from the U.S.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Emily Panozzo
    4th period

    There isn't any problem with this increase in business. The only problem would be trying to make this business boom happen in as many towns as we can. If an area doesn't have a certain appeal to it, then let it be. That doesn't mean to automatically abandon each and every town that has some weird characteristics, but it simply means to spend a little more time on the more profitable areas. How is our economy going to improve if all of our money is going to a worn down town? People can participate without completely dedicating all their time and effort to various areas. Give that effort to the already successful areas so they can be even better.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Danielle Uy 5th PeriodSeptember 26, 2010 at 11:16 AM

    I agree with Mishi, urbanization has many pros and cons. As a pro the people in this small town would have a bustling economy. Then it's also a negative because the town isn't traditional. It is also fair because North Dakota has far less of an unemployment rate than even the national average. For now, their economy will experience a surplus agriculturally and commercial-wise and what more can one ask for?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Bailey Banks
    6th period

    It's great to see many stores, restaurants, and lights around the city, but making every part of the U.S. like this would just take the fun out of traveling and etc. More little towns being industrialized would help the unemployment part, but would we want every state to look like New York City? What would happen to the animals, agriculture, and the people? This has many pros and cons, I think that some of the little cities should be industrialized but not all of them. Lets save some of the beautiful places in the U.S. All we want to do is build and build, after a while every thing is going to be concrete.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Samantha Twardowski
    3rd Period

    I believe that it is fantastic that a small town is trying to become a bigger town, but on the other hand, most things end up having a downside. The small town can end up running out of money for the more important things they would need. I think that there are enough big towns in the United States arlready and we dont need anymore to spend money on and pay attention to. Right now as the United States we have bigger issues to pay attention to right now.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I think that the emerging of this city is a sign of what to come in the future, for not only North Dakota, but for the rest of the country. We should be happy that this is happening because it is only helping our economy. This urbanization will bring many jobs and many new residents and help the economy of North Dakota and the U.S. This city should be a role model for cities in the U.S that are struggling with their economy. Hopefully this city can stay this way and continue to boom along with other cities. Any sign of economic growth would be great for this country.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Tyler Powers 5th period
    I think it is great to see cites in the Dakotas do well in a bad economy. This means more people with talent could move to those cities and makes these cities flourish once again. At the same time, it needs to have multiple big industries not just a couple. This is because with just a few you cannot have thousands upon thousands of people working in such few fields. If they increase the number of big industries, they could have a better chance of having more big cities in the Dakotas. This will cause more Americans and possibly more out of country employees to be employed there. The long term effect will cause an increase in economic state of the nation.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Nicolas Alba
    Period 2
    I think its great that a small town is thriving. That proves that people are moving everywhere instead of just to big towns. Honestly I thought this article was going to be about the wild life being restored or something like that. Its good that there is now another great urban city in our country.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anastasia Konik Period 5September 26, 2010 at 1:58 PM

    It is a great idea to expand industrialization, but we must be careful because too much of anything is bad. Having the Great Plains be visible is fantastic and all, plus with some farmers and urbanization then it's still good, but you must balance out everything considering if every farmer thinks he's got a great job well then half of our economy just got flushed down the toilet. Having new things here and there and spreading out will be beneficial for the economy, just not too much!

    ReplyDelete
  64. Period 3

    Seeing a once suffering town turn into thriving metropolis is both rewarding to the residents and the visitors of other cities. However, for cities that were once unpopular to turn into a thriving metropolis is astonishing in some aspects. If no person found anything with worth in a city, they would leave as soon as they could turn it into a ghost town. But as soon as one person learns of an important resource near or in the city limit, that city would start thriving, eventually becoming a metropolis for anyone who lives there.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Merin Mathew
    period 6

    I think it is good to have growth in the population and industry. If there to many people in urbanized cities, it would be crowed and unpleasant. I think that urbanizing is a great thing. But there is bad affects it can bring like being crowded and pollution. Urbanizing is good so it can higher employment in less populated area and increase population.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Prerna Kamnani
    4th Period

    I think urbanization of small towns is great. It provides more jobs for people and strengthens our economy. Although urbanization assists our economy in growing, it is ruining our country environmentally. We have countless number of big cities in the US already. That is already enough pollution and harm to the environment. Economically, urbanization is good because it is giving America's economy a little bit of a boost. Environmentally, urbanization of small towns is harmful to the earth, and we should try to find a balance in maintaining our economy and a way to stay green.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Courtnei Coleman Period 5September 26, 2010 at 2:14 PM

    I think that this is a good idea and a bad idea. It can be a bad thing if trying to save the Earth and also the people. This is increase pollution and possibly the crime rate. This can be a godd idea because it's always a good thing to move to a new area to experience new things and to meet and interact with different types of people. Small town or city, it's about trying something new. Which is why I believe that industries being established in the Great Plains would definetely be a positive but negative thing. Many people like living in a big city better than living in the counrty for many different reasons. They think that the country is boring which can be true at times but not always.

    ReplyDelete
  68. It is a great thing seeing big American companies staying in America. These companies such as, Microsoft, are helping revive an area that has lost a number of people, who went to seeking a better life in different states. This region is going to be revived if it stays a low number of people are going to be laid off. Also, it will remain successful if it contains the one of highest number of college graduates which will create more jobs. But, at the same time Microsoft and a few other industries can revive a whole area. To be successful they need to start creating more industries out of the industries already there such as the industries of coal, fossil fuels and farming. They could think about coming more to the age like using at the farms creating biodiesel. This could be an even bigger push to revive the Great Plains.
    Tyler Powers 5th

    ReplyDelete
  69. Jeffrey Jhingree
    4th period

    I did not know a lot about the economy and the struggles that the people in the Dakotas had to deal with. I think that it is good that small towns there are going back to the way that they used to be. It's good that people are starting to go back to live and work there. In our economy today it is hard to find jobs. If people go to live and work in rural areas, then it would probably not be as hard to find a job there because many do not want to go live there.

    ReplyDelete
  70. North Dakota is one of those states that I never thought much about. I mean, I knew it was one of the 50 states, but to me there wasn't anything special about it. It's great to see that parts of it are growing. More jobs will be created for unemployed people, which might really help the nation's economy. Although there will also be negative effects, like pollution. And, as others have said, it could take away from the beauty that is the great plains. Hopefully a lot of good will come from it.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Travis Crissman
    2nd period

    Many people have commented that it is a good thing that these small towns are starting to have a better population and industrialize with big capitalist businesses moving in and interrupting the peace and harmony of a small rural town. Have you ever been to a little town, for example, Fredericksburg, Texas? They have small shops, and each time I go there I never see any big name businesses. The town is full of small, privately owned businesses. With so many big cities across the United States, it is a nice break to visit a peaceful and quiet town where you can actually see the stars out at night. So many people are only focused on what modern society can do for the economy and don't even consider all the beautiful things, including nature, that are only found in small town America. I do not like the idea of big business in small towns. I believe they do not belong.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I think that the economic crisis is getting at large. The people need to take action on this problem solve it. If everyone helps out then we can really make a diffrence in America. And so that can solve one of America's major problems.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Neethu George
    3rd period

    I think that urbanizing places like the Great Plains can be both good and bad. It can be good because the rural areas can be more popular and there would be more jobs. It can be bad because if these areas are going to be filled with industries and big buildings, there wouldn't be any beauty left to see. We need to see the beauty the country of America offers. So the urbanization of these cities can have these good and bad effects.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Ervin Ricasio
    5th period

    It’s great to see more people move into un-populated cities than in over-populated cities. Sooner or later, some of the unknown cities will become well know. The growth of the industry and population in cities were a dramatic change. There are many advantages and disadvantages through this change. It would be great to have more industries and companies come in to barely populated cites, but it would be bad because of air pollution from cars and machines. The nation is pretty much trying to balance out different parts of the area.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Ervin Ricasio
    5th period

    It’s great to see more people move into un-populated cities than in over-populated cities. Sooner or later, some of the unknown cities will become well know. The growth of the industry and population in cities were a dramatic change. There are many advantages and disadvantages through this change. It would be great to have more industries and companies come in to barely populated cites, but it would be bad because of air pollution from cars and machines. The nation is pretty much trying to balance out different parts of the area.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Cortney Corley
    4th period

    I think its great that the Great plains is doing good economically. Like many people above me said, it could help pull us out of the recession. This boom could employ many people and help our economy. There is nothing wrong with industrializing the Great Plains. The U.S. started off rural and now it is very productive.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Grace Bonojo
    4th period

    Everyone has the idea that just because it's a big city means there's more opportunities, while that's true there also is the fact there also job opportunities in small states/cities too. I think it's great that this place is finally getting a boom in business and population. Sometimes we forget the little things that build us up and only notice the big final product. Now that we recognize the smallest strengths maybe we as a nation can build on it...

    ReplyDelete
  78. Grace Bonojo
    4th period

    Everyone has the idea that just because it's a big city means there's more opportunities, while that's true there also is the fact there also job opportunities in small states/cities too. I think it's great that this place is finally getting a boom in business and population. Sometimes we forget the little things that build us up and only notice the big final product. Now that we recognize the smallest strengths maybe we as a nation can build on it...

    ReplyDelete
  79. Melvin Valimattathil
    6th period

    I think it’s good that people are moving into small places. I think this will help the unemployment rates will go down because they're better opportunities there.In this economy jobs are limited and with new jobs coming there will be a better future. I know that this could be bad for the environment, but it can help alot of people too.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Merin Mathew
    period 6

    I think it is good to have growth in the population and industry. If there to many people in urbanized cities, it would be crowed and unpleasant. I think that urbanizing is a great thing. But there is bad affects it can bring like being crowded and pollution. Urbanizing is good so it might higher employment in less populated area and increase population.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Nick Grieger
    2nd Period

    I am very glad that a small town has urbanized itself, but if we all move in there at once there will be no space. So I believe that if people want to stay there they need to slowly trickle in. I do believe that some cities need to be urbanized, but I do like to go to just small towns, because everybody knows everyone and all of the shops are really close.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Azim Hemdani
    Period 2
    I consider the boom to be good and bad because it can have a good or a bad effect over a region. There are many types of booms as listed in the passage such as the technology boom, oil boom, and etc. That is good technology is increasing so that way we are able to make changes in the world. It was also talking about how city life is changing where in some places the population is increasing and in some places decreasing. The wages have gone up also creating a better wealth class. In places where there is less wages there is less money required for living like towns rather than in bigger places such as cities. Life is increasing very fast and as it goes on it gets better in most ways. Like some people wouldn’t have expected for the wages to go up or the technology to get better. Overall my point is that life and the things needed in life are increasing creating a better society but we need to improve the things that stop our society from being a utopia.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Tommy Settlemyre 3rd periodSeptember 26, 2010 at 6:33 PM

    The Great Plains region is the breadbasket of the country. If all the farmers of the region are moving into the cities, then from whom will we get our crops? Because of this movement, wheat and corn prices will go up and everyone will suffer. It is great that the North Dakotans are happy, but we need somebody to produce our corn!

    ReplyDelete
  84. K'Vonna Johnson
    5th period
    It's a great thing that America is changing for the better.The only bad thing is the fact that it messes with nature.This new movement will cause there to be more pollution and it will take away the natural beauty of the country and its open plains.

    ReplyDelete
  85. They say that not that long ago the Midwestern towns were going to be disserted. Yet, there are more people than ever in those towns. All of the towns that had the least amount of people are the ones that have more than ever and the best employment rates in the nation. My question is, what is going to happen when everyone has migrated to the "Hot Spots"? Is a reverse effect going to take place and everyone moves back to where they were? Or will everywhere else be as those small towns started out like?

    Alexandria Stanciel, 3rd period.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Gabriel Flores
    6th period

    As well as most of the people who commented, I also think that it is great to see the Great Plains striving back into its buisness. The thing about our country is that we struggle as a whole. There are the ups and the downs, and in this case we are starting to see some good parts of our economy. There are some areas that differentiate the economy because of its conditions, which make it hard for good industries to last there. But know that the whole great plains is booming in its buisness shows us that there is a hope for our future economy. This just goes to show you how some small towns and less well known places and can still thrive and maintain business.

    ReplyDelete
  87. It's a good yet bad thing that America's growing. The moving into towns part is a thumbs up, only because of the employment rate going up. But then again, the crowding into the towns isn't such a great idea for the town overall, if you catch my drift.. Sure it'd be great for more company in the area, there's nothing wrong with that, but when it becomes too many that causes issues. The characteristics of a town could change due to it. But as I said earlier, the people looking for jobs right now, have something to look forward to.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Aileen Nguyen
    Period 3

    It's nice to know these "unpopular" cites are becoming noticed. There's even an increase in the amount of employed people. However, the growth of these cities could lead to the abandonment of other small places(cities, towns, etc). I for one would not favor such a thing. It would be better if people moved into the "booming" cities , but at the same time have people move into the smalller places as well to keep the levels of population somewhat balanced.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Stephen Castillo
    4th Period
    The growth described in Fargo and Omaha is similar. to the growth in Sugar Land Town Square. Because of the growth in business, Sugar Land benefits off of the low unemployment rate. It’s really cool that the towns have decreased in the needs for foreign goods and have started making their own supply. And it’s not just the Fargo and Omaha, the central U.S. has begun to embark on a journey to go green and use less foreign oil.

    ReplyDelete
  90. I agree with Nick Brouwer because it is a very conflicting subject.The natural beauty of our states need to be preserved. But with the growing population we do need more and more urbanized areas.Yes,people will take the initiative and save some trees. But there are people like me that are afraid that in about the next 50 years, we will be overwhelmed and we will destroy the world where our ansestors once lived.
    Abin Joes
    Period 2

    ReplyDelete
  91. I believe that a city can only grow as big as people make and let it be. Because if you go back to when the colonies first started,they didn't already have buildings,houses and restaurants. They had to build up to that, from absolutely nothing expect the things the generation left behind. It could be considerd a bad and/or good thing. It just depends on the perspective you look at it through. Because if a city grows and grows and invites more people in, the problem of over population comes into act. As well as transportation problems, if people all use cars that aren't the most economically friendly, then it'll increase pollution and contribute to global warming. But then again if a city uses it potential to grow, it outlines and represents how diverse America as a nation can come to be.

    Betty P.
    3rd period.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Parker Wodskow
    6th Period
    I also think industrialization in the great plains is a good thing. The only problem with building in the great plains because of all the air pollution it causes. Also another bad reason for this is because it would bring many people into these small towns and making the small and peacefull town that they live in. Maybe if all these people move there they will get more jobs so I think it's good that people will be moving into these small towns.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Andremarie Jean
    4th Period

    I think it is good and a bad thing that people are moving more to the city. The fact that people are starting to realize that they can make a better living by moving to the city is great. It expands that certain city in so many ways. It is a bad thing because people don't get that full effect of living in a neighborhood type place. Mostly whats on their mind is getting to work. What if you were to have kids is raising them in the city the best place? What is good is that they get to bring the economy up by finding better ways to live, and if that is moving to the city then do it.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Dane Gantt
    Period 3

    I honestly think that this is just a phase. This exact same thing could happen in any city anywhere in the world, it all depends on the people of the area. The Great Plains will always be "Great" to someone, whereas for example Houston will always be "Great" for someone. It's not a big deal that people decided to highly populate the Great Plains.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Chris Bready
    6th

    If we all want to live in a single place then it is bad. We will be over crowded and run out of space. The major cities are like that. They have way to many people living in them.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Kaitlyn Trei
    Period 6

    I think that it is great that the city might get known. And that the small city might have a well growing industry.But I don't think that every city should do a big industry because then the economy couldn't handle all the industries. I don't think that this city could handle a metropolis because of what the economy is like right now.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Edward Richard 4th periodSeptember 26, 2010 at 7:53 PM

    Edward Richard
    4th Period

    First I want to start off by saying this article is very long. So I had a little trouble trying to figure out the main idea, but I think I got it. It is kinda of cool to see how these two cities evolved over time. Back then the people who lived there didnt seem thriled aout it, but now their atracting people from all over the world. It sures sounds like a place I would like to hang out for a few days.

    ReplyDelete
  98. I think it's great that cities in the midwest are doing so well when there are parts of the country that are going through crisis. It's also time that small cities got as much recognition as the larger cities do. I won't be surprised if one the cities stated in this article become as just famous as New York or Chicago. The Mid Western part of the United States is finally getting the recognition that it deserves. Also, if Mid Western cities become Metropollises then I think that the nice, calm country lifestyle will be lost. But overall the idea of small cities developing is a good thing.
    Ann Mathew P.6

    ReplyDelete
  99. Raphael Laran
    5th Period

    I personally dislike urban areas. Yes urban areas are important, a place where there are a lot of factories and where most of the things we use are produced. But the great plains, just laying in the grass and looking up to the stars... It is just amazing. A lot of people don't like the great plains or the out doors because it is hot or too many mosquitoes. Well it is just the feeling you get from nature that makes the great plains a great place.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Jr Zolayvar 6th PeriodSeptember 26, 2010 at 8:40 PM

    Everything changes, evolution takes over. We can only preserve lands like the Great Plains for so long. Free land in this country is scarce and soon i bet every piece of land that is available will be used, so this "movement" comes as no surprise. We live in a world where money is everything, because money equals power and urban economies produce more income than rural economies.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Rebecc Johnson, 5th PeriodSeptember 26, 2010 at 8:56 PM

    It is good to see industries growing in places such as small towns. But this can be good and bad at the same time. It can be good because people are industrializing, but it can be bad because with more factories there comes more air pollution. Also when small towns become to industrialized more people will start to move there and they will no longer be small towns. But if people move there from other big towns that big town will become smaller while that small town becomes bigger, this will lead to over population in some places, and under population in other places. But that is just me trying to predict the future; it does not necessarily mean that that is what is going to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  102. It's good to see that the Great Plains is being little bit more urbanized because most people I know usually just say that the Plains are a desolate wasteland. However, I don't want to see a big city or anything where eventually pollution is going to be a problem for the Plains. The main reason why its good though is because it will open up opportunities for people who are looking for jobs and happen to live in that region. This could be great for the U.S or maybe it's not going to workout we'll just wait and see.
    Joe James
    6th period

    ReplyDelete
  103. 6th period.

    To be honest, while reading this article I didn’t know where Fargo, North Dakota was or places like that. I would have never accepted the fact that cities located in the Great Plains would someday turn into New York City or anything. It's really good for cities all over America to be known and for the economy. It will help boast up America’s employment growth. Also, it will keep people off the streets.

    ReplyDelete
  104. 3rd Period

    It’s good that the Great Plains is now thriving again. This only proves that with time and faith that a once great place can become even greater. This also proves that people are moving around the U.S. and not just too big cities they hear about on television, or the news. But there is also a downfall to a town like this. If more and more people hear about it they will want to move there and the city would lose its uniqueness because of over popularity and other aspects of economy and government.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Alvin Mei
    2nd Period

    People moving into small town? Sounds good. This means that big cities are getting less crowded, and people in small towns have a better chance to find a job, than in bigger cities. The economy today is bad, and many people are losing their jobs, moving to small towns can be good for those who are unemployed. Also, moving might be a good thing for you family, because there is more open space to roam, and the traffic is less, and the air is more purified. Big cities such as Los Angeles, cars are everywhere, and the quality of the air isn't that great, so moving can be, a healthy thing.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Justin Johnson (6period)September 26, 2010 at 9:44 PM

    I think it is good to have people move into low populated area in search of a better life.
    I would have to disagree with Mackenzie Krus's statement when she said, "If all of these cities were to be urbanized, then I think that it would be a very eco-friendly disaster." If all cities were to grow in population, this will not only lead to a improvment in the economy, but also in technology and the advancement of living space. If cities were to grow twice their size now, this would be a challenge to not only think of better ways to improve living conditions, but to allow big businesses to grow and expand around the nation. This will eventually result in a improvement in this great nation we call "America"! We need cities to keep this economy running.
    - Justin Johnson
    6 period

    ReplyDelete
  107. Malcolm Berry
    5th period

    It's excellent to see that boom towns are on the rise again. The past two years have mainly been about economic depression. But the rise in towns like these shows that prosperity is underway. But the rise maybe dangerous if not looked out for. Cities provide technology which is deeply needed and a loss of that could cause economic failure in the and the downfall of our country if don't continue to stay competitive.

    ReplyDelete
  108. 3rd period
    I think that it is great that these small towns are getting lots of money. I think that small towns have their own allure. But I hope this doesn't become a problem because then these small towns would turn into big cities and ruin them with overpopulation and pollutioin just like the big cities. So good for the extra cash, nut don't let it become a big problem.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Stephen Castillo
    4th Period
    I believe that the use of the GPS unit to track the location of a suspected drug dealer by the DEA is appropriate if done correctly. That is a that a warrant is obtained legally once the DEA has proven that there is reasonable suspicion to a judge. Today, a law enforcement agency has to get a warrant to tap a suspects phone line, computer, or to search their homes. This should be the same for using a GPS unit.
    If we start allowing any law enforcement to do track the where-abouts of any person without reasonable suspicion of some unlawful activity then we quickly begin to slide down a slope of a Orwellian state.
    However, I do believe that this requirement of warrant NOT be applied to those suspects who are suspected terrorist, both domestic and international... as that delay in obtaining a warrant could have a catastrophic impact.

    ReplyDelete