Amazon Patents Procedure to Let Recipients Avoid Undesirable Gifts
Washington Post
By Michael S. Rosenwald
Monday, December 27, 2010
Undoubtedly, the Thread and Bobbin Sewing Kit that Aunt Mildred sent from Amazon.com for Christmas will never see a stitch. The Stallion Stable Music Box might have looked pretty on the computer screen, but under the tree's flickering lights, it is frightful. The polka-dot nightgown has never been a good idea, even with free shipping.
These gifts sent via some warehouse many miles away are not only unwanted, but also a multimillion-dollar headache: They have to be repacked, labeled, dropped off and shipped back to Amazon's Island of Misfit Toys. Then a new present has to be packed, labeled and shipped again. Efficient, the process is not.
Amazon is working on a solution that could revolutionize digital gift buying. The online retailer has quietly patented a way for people to return gifts before they receive them, and the patent documents even mention poor Aunt Mildred. Amazon's innovation, not ready for this Christmas season, includes an option to "Convert all gifts from Aunt Mildred," the patent says. "For example, the user may specify such a rule because the user believes that this potential sender has different tastes than the user." In other words, the consumer could keep an online list of lousy gift-givers whose choices would be vetted before anything ships.
Amazon's idea has raised the ire of the Miss Manners crowd, which thinks the scheme rather uncouth. After all, receiving an e-mail notification of a forthcoming gift - and thereby being able to check its price - is hardly the same as unwrapping the item at home.
Anna Post, great-great-granddaughter of the late etiquette author Emily Post and spokeswoman for the Emily Post Institute, said she hopes the company realizes it is risking major backlash and abandons the idea. Because of Amazon's dominance online, she and others say they fear the idea could spread throughout the e-retailing industry, which this holiday season racked up $28 billion in gift purchases.
"This idea totally misses the spirit of gift giving," Post said. "The point of gift giving is to allow someone else to go through that action of buying something for us. Otherwise, giving a gift just becomes another one of the world's transactions."
The proposal has also brought into focus a very costly part of the e-retailing business model: Up to 30 percent of purchases are returned, and the cost of getting rejected gifts back across the country and onto shelves has online retailers scrambling for ways to reduce these expenses.
"It's in the millions of dollars, and it might even be billions," said Carl Howe, a Yankee Group consumer technology analyst. "If you can get the right gift to a person the first time, this could be a huge cost-saving invention. From a retailer's perspective, this is like gold."
Amazon's timeline for introducing the idea to consumers is unclear, as is its plan for marketing the concept without offending gift givers who take great pride in their selection of unfortunate Christmas sweaters for their favorite nieces and nephews. Officials from the Seattle retailer did not return numerous e-mail and phone requests for comment. But Amazon appears to be quite serious: Its patent was awarded not just to Amazon, but to its founder, Jeff Bezos.
Amazon's patent is 12 pages long, with numerous diagrams, including a "Gift Conversion Rules Wizard" that shows how a user could select rules such as, "No clothes with wool." The document makes for curious reading, reducing the art of gift giving to the dry language of patentry.
"It sometimes occurs that gifts purchased on-line do not meet the needs or tastes of the gift recipient," the patent says. "In some cases, concern that the gift recipient may not like a particular gift may cause the person sending the gift to be more cautious in gift selection. The person sending the gift may be less likely to take a chance on a gift that is unexpected but that the recipient might truly enjoy, opting instead for a gift that is somewhat more predictable but less likely to be converted to something else."
In even drier language - "an exemplary embodiment relates to a computer-implemented data processing system comprising a user interface and gift conversion logic" - Amazon explains complicated algorithms that help users create rules about what to do in certain gift situations, such as "Convert any gift from Aunt Mildred to a gift certificate, but only after checking with me."
Most cleverly - or deviously, depending on your attitude toward this sort of manipulation - the gift giver will be none the wiser: "The user may also be provided with the option of sending a thank you note for the original gift," according to the patent, "even though the original gift is converted." (Alternatively, a recipient could choose to let the giver know he has exchanged the item for something else.)
Amazon's idea represents the most drastic way of reducing return shipping costs in e-retailing. Companies have taken steps on the front end, including wish lists and e-mailed gift cards. ("I don't think gift cards are the end of the world, but people should try harder first," Post said.)
On the back end, retailers are trying to reduce shipping costs by using the less expensive U.S. Postal Service for at least part of the return journey. The Postal Service has partnered with its competitor, Federal Express, on a program called SmartPost, which consolidates individual packages into larger shipments.
"Any time you have to touch a product, there's a cost associated with that, and those costs add up," said Kevin Brown, marketing director for Newgistics, a Texas company that specializes in simplifying returns for e-retailers.
But it's not just shipping costs that e-retailers struggle with on returns. There are labor costs, too. Brown said each return typically results in about two phone calls to customer service lines. Also, returns require processing at distribution centers, which means extra staffing during the holiday season. And many opened products can't be returned to manufacturers and must be sold at a loss as refurbished items.
"This is absolutely a huge business problem," said Howe, the Yankee analyst.
Which is why, he said, shipping the right gift the first time seems like such a high priority. But although Amazon's idea might be exciting to analysts from a cost-savings perspective, even they admit there are potential drawbacks.
"This would require a huge shift in consumer behavior, which is always hard to achieve," Howe said. "And there's really some risk of backlash here."
Post, upholding her great-great-grandmother's legacy, said: "Gift giving is not just about the loot. It's about the fact that someone thought to get you something, and took the time to do it. That's no small thing in this world."
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Marissa Moss
ReplyDelete5th Period
Amazon's idea, I think, is a great, and innovative idea. Though it might change the tradition of gift giving a tad, it still would be an efficent tool to have. If you want to buy somebody something and your not sure if they will like it, just tell them what it is and say they can return it if they want! After all, when you give a gift, it's not really about the mystery of not getting the gift untill a certain day, it's the thought that someone took the time to pick out something for you, buy it, and then worried that you wouldn't like it. (Let's not forget that they are getting you anything at all). I don't think anyone would be offended by it, because if they are they're not really thinking about the GIVING part. Also, if it would only be an option, then why cant't people who think it is a good idea do it anyway?
Cortney Corley
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
I think that its wrong for amazon to send the receiver an email about what gift they will get. It ruins the surprise of the present. Holidays shouldn't be about what you get, they should be about giving and loving. One should be thankful they even got something. I'm sure it costs a lot to go back and forth over and over when returning a present, but I think you should at least look at the present before you immediately send it back. I agree with the quote on the last paragraph, "Gift giving is not just about the loot. It's about the fact that someone thought to get you something, and took the time to do it. That's no small thing in this world."
Neethu George
ReplyDelete3rd period
I think what Amazon is doing is good. If someone doesn't like a present then they won't use it and it would be a waste. But if the receiver gets an e-mail about what they're getting they can decide if they want it or not. Besides, it's the thought that counts. The receiver should be happy that someone thought of them and the sender should be happy because he or she did a good thing.
I don't think its right that the recipient gets to know what his aunt wanted to send him and reject it. I feel like that's very unkind. I think it would be smarter if they have an idea of an online gift giving system with a gift certificate. I also feel like it would be offensive to the giver if a person rejects their gift. I like Amazon's idea, but I feel like they can alter it to make it more sincere.
ReplyDeleteAnn Mathew. P.6
I think that it's a great idea! Even though you are getting notified before hand, I wouldn't want someone to waste their money on something I would never use. If someone gets me a cymbal but it's not the exact one I want, I can exchange it and get the one I want. It only makes sense. I completely disagree with the gift ruining aspect of the article. I respect that someone gave me a gift, but unless it's very special or handmade, I would much rather have something I can actually use. Plus, you can probably turn off this option anyways, so if you still want that nostalgia factor of giving, then it's up to you. But for me, I'm completely sold on this and hope to try it out in the near future.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Courtney it does ruin the whole aspect of surprise. However you should know what your getting, so when you get the gift and it's not at all what you expected, you can be a little on the angry side. I think that the idea that Amazon has can be good and bad. We will just have to see how the new idea plays out throughout the next couple of months and through the next winter holidays.
ReplyDeleteJay Shah
ReplyDelete6th Period
I am not very attracted to this idea as it does ruin the surprise. But I think that many of us already know what we are going to get or tell our parents what to get us. So I guess a email notifying you what you are going to get isn't that bad, compared to a sweater you find years from now in the back of your closet making you think, "Hey I should of worn that!" Maybe we do want the surprise but what if your aunt comes over and makes you wear the embarrassing shirt she got you at a reunion? However, the wishlist idea is very smart, because you can get a email telling you to make a wishlist from the gift sender. After you put on the stuff that you want the most, the sender can pick some items to send you. In today's economy, the money that Amazon saves could help them survive a couple more years.
To me, this is a good idea from Amazon, though it may have some unintended side-effects. This cuts down costs on their end, and reduces the hassle of returning gifted items on the end of the consumer. It's also good that they are working on the return procedures, and I'm glad about that since I frequently order things from Amazon. I haven't had to return anything yet, but if I did then I really would not want to go through that tedious ordeal. On the not so good side of the deal, as far as gift giving goes this can potentially destroy the way the gifts are sent and received. It's the thought that counts, right?
ReplyDeleteAjeet Baath
ReplyDelete6th Pd.
I also agree the Amazon’s idea of gift returning is extremely helpful and innovative. While the simple fact of giving is alright, it is better to receive a gift that you truly want. Why pretend that you like the gift when you really don’t? While it’s true that it’s the thought that counts, the thought cannot be complete if the person receiving the gift doesn’t like it. Although it might upset the person who sent the gift, it should comfort them with the fact that the receiver is going to get what they really wanted. Someone once said that it is better to give than to receive. On the other hand, receiving isn’t all the bad either.
This patent Amazon has come up with is brilliant. It saves money and no one gets unwanted presents. I hate getting unwanted presents. I mean I love that the person thought of me enough to actually send me a present but unwanted presents are just a pain in the neck. They take up room in my closet and just sit there unused. That present could be elsewhere, actually used and wanted. It is a waste of space, money, gift wrap paper, ribbons, and the time it took to pack the entire thing. If I were to know what the present I am receiving actually is, then I could accept it or reject it. Sure, it ruins the surprise of opening a present, but there are other presents to be opened and think about what a surprise it would be if you opened a present and BAM!! The dress that you absolutely hate is staring back at you. Oh yes! What a wonderful surprise. To reduce bad surprises and awkward conversations like “Of course I LOVE the present Grandma,” I think it would be best to use Amazon’s new patent.
ReplyDeleteLillian Cancino
ReplyDelete3rd Period
I agree with Post, People really should try harder when it comes to giving a gift. A gift card is a good choice, but only when you have a least tried harder to give them something special and could not find the right gift. If you automatically give a person a gift card, and you didn't even try to get something else, that just shows that you are lazy or that you don't really care about that person.
I think Amazon came up with a new innovative idea, but it can also be hurtful to the gift giver. After all this time was spent into thinking of what the person would like then they just exchange it for something different, it could become very hurtful. I think people who have a real problem could just stop being lazy and go to the store or if you think they won't like the present send them a link to the gift and get them an Amazon gift card, so they could pick that gift or another one. All that matters is that you were thinking about them at all.
ReplyDeleteAlthough it should be the thought that counts that someone gave you a gift and I completely agree with this statement. It shouldn't be about what you got you should just be thankful. Although this is how the world is supposed to be, in reality, or I should say in modern day many, many, many, people actually worry about the gift. Few people have the great values to think about the thought and instead they care about what they got. By Amazon doing it this way, the person will get what they want, the companies will save thousands of dollars (as our country is in debt), and it will also reduce the hassle for the buyer. This way it’s a win-win situation.
ReplyDeleteKaylah Moore
ReplyDeletePeriod 2
Even the thought of this idea is taking away the love there’s supposed to be behind the holidays. The holidays are supposed to be about fun and quality time with your family and friends; you’re supposed to enjoy it. But now days the only thing that people think about during the holidays, is what gift they’re going to get and how much it’ll cost. This idea does nothing but make that idea stronger; then yet again, the idea is going in the same direction as everyone else’s’ idea of what the holidays are about. But I still think that they shouldn’t go through with this idea of seeing what gift you’re going to get and how much it’s going to cost. And I’m definitely apposing the idea of gloating to the person about how you traded or returned the gift; I mean way to put a person down.
The idea is a touchy subject for traditional gift givers. However, it is a good way for the company to have less shipping since they'll get it right the first time. I agree with Marisa in the basis that it's the thought that counts in the gift at least the giver is thinking about the recipient. Plus the recipient shouldn't be too picky because that's materialistic. On the other hand the idea has a major con. The recipient would see the value of the gift. In my culture, it's not right to analyze the value based on the price. So if you see the price it's not courteous towards the giver's efforts.
ReplyDeleteAmita Batra
ReplyDelete3rd Period
I know if I bought somebody a gift from amazon, I would not want them to know what it is. I know I would feel twice as bad if the person I gave a gift to returned it after I looked hours and hours for the perfect gift. I would also not want to return someone's gift because I would feel guilty. I feel like modernizing gifts this way will make human nature a lot more selfish. Though you may not always get something you'll love, you should always appreciate what you have. After all, it's the thought that counts!
Shelby Hendon
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
I think this idea ruins the idea of gift giving. It's not about what you get, but it's about giving in general. It doesn't matter what you got, if someone was nice enough to give it to you, you should be thankful for it. The holidays aren't about getting everything you want. They're about being thankful for what you get. I mean, they didn't have to give you anything, but the fact that they got you something at all should be gift enough.
Prerna Kamnani
ReplyDelete4th Period
I am not very fond of the idea Amazon has created. In the season of giving, it is the thought that counts. It should not matter what someone got you. People should care about the thought and love behind the gift. I understand that this idea is to prevent the loss of money, but I think it just ruins the idea of gift giving. I mean the Christmas season is supposed to be about enjoying the time with friends and family. People have become too materialistic.
Personally, I agree, and disagree with this topic. I agree because it's a great way to exchange gifts. Plus if you sent a real present, (not from online) a few days before Christmas, then it might not get there until the day after Christmas. So its a great way to ship things on time. I disagree because I do also think it ruins the surprise of the gift. Also I agree with Prerna by saying that the season is about giving and people have become too materialistic. So this is a very undecidable topic.
ReplyDeleteEvery Christmas I get to prove that I really know someone by buying them something I really think they would appreciate. This shows the person that I know them and can observe their personality and decide of a gift to give them. Then again my take on Christmas is the classic Dickens portrayal which observes not just giving to your friends but charity along with family and friends getting together. I don’t want to sound like one of those “War on Christmas” activists but Christmas has turned into a season of consumerism and the Amazon deal really crystallizes that.
ReplyDelete3rd period
ReplyDeleteOnce again we have come up with a whole new way to ruin modern day life by abusing technology. This is just plain wrong! After all I agree witht the lady who says that it takes away from the feeling of gift giving. Also the flaw to this is what if you choose something that you think you would hate but would actually like it. I say leave enough alone and stop being so greedy.
Tyler Morris
ReplyDelete4th period
I also have to agree with Lloyd, Christmas used to be about family and charity. Now it has turned into a monster of receipts and colorful gift wrap. We do have problems with shipping and things of that sort though. If we could put that knowledge into say, shipping vaccines, we could do something helpful.
Carolyne Lu
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
A lot of people's comments are about Christmas. I'm aware that this article mainly talks about the Christmas season, but we need to think about it this way: what if it wasn't Christmas? What if it was a birthday or just a special day? I honestly cannot say if I agree with what Amazon's doing or not. What some people are saying, like Anna Post, about how it's the thought that counts is extremely valid, but like the one example in the beginning of the article said: what if you got something you really didn't want? You'd feel torn about hurting that person's feelings by not using what they got you. Amazon just came up with this idea to make everything as convenient as possible, for them and for us. However, I'm sure if you don't like this new idea, you can always disable it, like Cedric said, or you could just not buy from Amazon!
Jenny Chang
ReplyDeletePeriod 5
I agree with this idea. If I give someone a gift, I would want it to be useful. That gift should not become a burden for the person or a permanent resident inside his closet. The fact that the gift is loved by the receiver brings more meaning to this event. However, I also agree that it's the thought that matters the most.
3rd period
ReplyDeleteI believe that what amazons thinking of doing isn’t well thought out. When people give a gift they want the receiver to be surprised and not say "thanks I was wondering when I would get it in from the mail". You want them to be amazed that there is someone out there thinking of them. For people who are worried about around Christmas time and whether the person will like it, that’s what a Christmas list is for. People just need to calm down and think about what they’re saying.
Nick Mathai
ReplyDelete6th period
I personally think this is a great idea considering my personal experience. One Christmas a lot of my aunts and uncles ended up giving my little sister dolls when she was in first grade but she hated dolls because she was more like a tomboy. She started crying to my parents about what she got and I ended up sharing my cool toys with her. So I would think that people should be able to reject their gift and get a different one instead so that they do not get the some gift they already have or a gift they don't like at all.
Hmm. I don't know if it is just me, but I see this as a middle finger salute to the person who bought the gift. It is not fair for this person to spend a portion of their time looking for and buying a gift for you and then you turn around and undo it and get, what, a gift certificate? And then you have the option of sending a thank you note saying "Thank you for your gift, but frankly your gift giving skills suck and thats why I have you marked." Just be APPRECIATIVE that you got something, because it is the thought that counts. Stop being a self centered brat and just be nice for once in your short miserable life.
ReplyDeletePeriod 2
ReplyDeleteI understand that most people don't like the idea that Amazon saving money but most people would not want to have a gift that is dangerous to their children. For example, my uncle got my father a hunting weapon but once my mother saw my father clutching the weapon, she threw it in the garbage the next day so none of the people in the family would get hurt. So I would understand that Amazon is saving money but then that gives the person who receives the E-Mail to arrange if the present is acceptable into the family.
Riquerra Broadnax (Period 2)
ReplyDeleteI think Amazons idea is awesome. Who wants to worry all the time about what gift to give to someone and whether they like it or not when they can just take it bake if they want to. But also I do understand this could ruin the spirit of Christmas by giving back a present given to you from the givers heart. To put it plain and simple Christmas is really suppose to be a time when you spend time with your family and eat so if you get any gifts it’s a blessing.
Sarah Raines
ReplyDelete4th Period
I think it is diffidently an interesting idea, but I’m not sure if I like it. Yes, perhaps it’s the thought that counts, but how much thought are you putting into a gift that you are so unsure if the recipient likes it that you would have to do this. And for me not only dose thought count, but I really like surprises. So if someone were to ruin the anticipation before the actual date and just flat out tell me what it is would probably be a little bummed. On a brighter side it dose make gift GIVING a lot easier.
Abels Koshy
ReplyDeletePeriod: 6
I think this is a great thing that Amazon is doing. This method is very user-friendly. If someone doesn't like a present then they won't use it and it would be a waste.
It saves money and no one gets unwanted presents. It's also good that they are working on the return procedures, and I'm glad about that since I frequently order things from Amazon.
Logan Gloster
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
I think it is a good idea to be able to ship back unwanted gifts but overall I believe it to be a waste of time and money. It also defeats the purpose of giving because one could just send back a gift they wouldn't want. If someone truly did not want their gift and it was something simple such a sweater then they should give it to charity. I'm sure some poor soul would be grateful for a sweater even an ugly one.
Nina tames
ReplyDeletep. 3
Like many people above me, I agree that holidays aren't just about the presents and what yout get. It's about giving. Most of us all get something we aren't crazy about, but that doesn't mean we should just go return it. It's the thought that counts! Just imagine how that person is going to feel if they found out. They'd be crushed after looking forever to find you the PERFECT gift. Straight up selfish if you ask me.
In my opinion, this invention from Amazon is stupid. You should be happy that you even received a present. There are many people in this world that don’t even get to celebrate Christmas, because of their circumstances. I personally believe that this idea is breaking a long lived tradition, that shouldn’t be broken. If you don’t approve of the gift, give it to someone less fortunate.
ReplyDeleteI myself don’t like the idea of receiving gifts I simply don’t need or want. So I think Amazon’s new idea is brilliant and will be supported greatly by people like me. I know it should be the thought that counts that someone gave you a gift and I completely agree with this statement. It shouldn't be about what you got you should just be thankful. Although this isn’t true, the reality is that people will remain having their own thoughts and ideas on a subject and it’s what makes us human.
ReplyDeleteKiah Rayford
3 period
Why is this not optional? This obviously has divided online buyers and making this optional would calm everyone down. This does not seem like it will follow through anyways. It will get all this negative press and Amazon will have to remove it.
ReplyDeleteCharlene Sigua
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
I don't think this is a good idea. Whether it be Christmas time or not, it's really just the thought that counts for a gift that someone gave you. And really, gifts aren't what Christmas or any other occasion is about. This really does show how greedy some people can be.
There is a positive and a negative side to this. I believe that gifts should be a surprise. When I get a gift, I may ask what it is because I'm curious but I am never told what it is. That is the best part of gifts. But on the more positive side of this invention, there are some things that people just don't want. I have received gifts that I never wanted or asked for and it is sometimes no use to me. I just have to remember that everyone in the world don't receive gifts and I am thankful for what I am given and that my family is fortunate enough to supply me with those things. This process should be optional, a possible question that could be asked when the gift receiver gets the email is, "would you like to view the gift? yes or no." We all know that many people won't click no because they want to know what they will be receiving but it's always good to have different options.
ReplyDeleteEsteban Palacios
ReplyDelete6th period
There are many opinions I have but the one that stands out the most is why Amazon is even taking back those gifts if that’s what they are supposed to be, gifts. If the people were smart enough to realize that, they would be thankful to even receive one. Amazon is only giving those prices to get back what they bought back. Or are they? I mean if they were gifts why are they selling them and at such high prices, according to the article. The idea Courtnei Coleman put forward about having options on the gift is a good idea but people might not just want that. They might also want a price tag with the estimate for the entire shipping and handling as well. But its all up to Amazon for that.
Mayur Patel
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
It is little weird how you are aware of whatever your getting before hand, but it doesn't really ruin anything because if you find out 2 days before or on the special day, you are still getting it and eventually will find out what it is. It doesn't matter about when you find out, it is the mindset that you should have by knowing how much time the giver took out of his day to go look for your gift and the effort he/she might have put in it.
Anthony Chenevert
ReplyDelete2nd Period
I think that is ridiculous what amazon is doing people are having to go out of their way just so that they can give out of the kindness of their hearts. Why would you reject a present anyway? Its free! That really "grinds my gears" So if your grandparents/parents got you a present are you going to tell hem that you don't want it. That is very inconsiderate and selfish. Now a days things are more precious than they used to be so you have to cherish what you have now.
I know that I will never use the tool because I do not shop at Amazon anyway. Nevertheless, I think that Amazon should follow through with its plan. The author of this article is worried about consumer backlash. The only way to know if there will be consumer backlash is if Amazon follows through. If it is a bad idea, then they will get rid of it. It is no use to hammer on Amazon and "commercial Christmas" because there are children dying all over the world that need our attention more than Amazon.
ReplyDeleteI don't really know what to think of this idea. As a giver, I guess this could hurt my feelings; if I spent a while looking for a good gift for someone, only to have it exchanged for something else, I would be annoyed and maybe hurt. But as a receiver, this is really helpful. I do get things that I wouldn't exactly like or use, they usually end up wasted in my "bad" gift closet. So if you knew what you were going to get and were able to change it, bad gift closets would no longer exist! But I don't know if I would be able to do that to any of my family. As much as I hate tacky clothes and weird decorations, I love the looks on my family's faces when they give them to me. Honestly, I think the act of giving is more important than the gift itself.
ReplyDeleteAmazon's idea is pretty clever but, if someone gave you a gift then you should accept it even though you may not like it. It's being rude to the person who gave it to you. I'm sure there are other ways to give gifts to other people but this one just isn't getting to me.
ReplyDeletePeriod 5
To be completely honest, this is one of the most inconsiderable things done. People don't realize that while someone giving you a gift is no big deal, so if you were to return it it would only make you happy. But did you think of yourself as the sender? Putting time into choosing a gift that in your opinion would make them happy, and then having the receiver just change the gift so they like it...what happened to it's the thought that counts? Even so, if they wanted to send you a gift card for YOU to pick something out, THEY would. Appreciate what you get and stop being only considerate of your feelings.
ReplyDeleteDanielle S.
ReplyDelete2nd Period
I think Amazon has the right intentions, but I wouldn't want to receive an e-mail telling me about my gift! If someone gets me a gift we are usually close enough for me to tell them the truth about how I feel towards the gift. I don't think this will last long on Amazon.
2nd period
ReplyDeleteThis idea is a relatively good one. Not only does it scrap the lengthy and tiresome process of returning...unattractive gifts, it also gives the reciever a chance to know beforehand of what they are getting and what they can exchange it for. True it does raise some serious issues over insensitivity. But as the article said it's only effective if a good population of the online shoppers opt for it. It is a move that was made with the considerations of both parties in mind. It could turn out to be successful after all.
Gabriel Camera
ReplyDelete6th period
I think that the process of returning gifts is a really good idea because some people don't like what they get for Christmas. But in the other hand I think that buying things online is not a good idea because you can't see what you are going to give to the other person.(I only buy things from nike.com and thats it)
Most people see the surprise of a holiday present as a major part of the Christmas spirit. Revealing that present beforehand would ultimately ruin many families' Christmases. Although it wouldn't affect my family since we basically tell each other what we want and we don't use Amazon, Ebay, etc. It'd still affect many others, as can be seen by all the negative comments received regarding the article.
ReplyDeleteDaniel Thai
Period 5
Marcus Levine
ReplyDelete4th period
I understand what Amazon is trying to do, and if someone sent me some thing that I did not like with a passion, I would debate if I would just get something else. But then there is that sub-consious of mine telling me that "it is wrong". So what if it is wrong, if Amazon is making money... well... good for them, thy're doing something that most of America is still trying to pick up on. It's not that this is the right thing to do, but it is the smart thing to do
Jade Martin
ReplyDelete4th period
I actually think that this is a good idea. Sometimes it's really hard to choose a gift for someone and you end up getting them something that they already have. Some of the gifts also never get put to use. With Amazon's new thing, it will take the suprise away but at least you know what you are getting and if it will be put to use.
Jerry George
ReplyDelete3rd Period
This idea of actually choosing to replace gifts can push some buttons in people, and yet help out many consumers including myself. Usually, the process of gift giving is always that you must be 'grateful' for the time and consideration the other person has spent to give you the gift, not on how the gift is useless to them. But if people can instantly choose a gift to send and can get it to their receiver within 3-5 business days, it can lower the amount of consideration the holidays are meant to be about. I would personally regret getting something that someone else got with little effort. That said, this idea Amazon has is clever and obviously useful. Sure, it seems lame to reject a gift that someone gave to you, but many people cannot just be limited to letting something rot because they did not like it. They need something to use, and will keep returning gifts if there is no other option just as anyone would return or throw away a fruit cake someone made for them, if it obviously is not edible.
I agree with Nick Brouwer on the idea that this exchange for gifts should be optional. From only this blog, people have different opinions on the idea. In making the exchange of unwanted gifts optional, Amazon will not get as much negative feedback, because the user has the choice of activating the program for unwanted gifts or not.
ReplyDeleteErica Barrera
ReplyDelete5th period
I think it’s a great idea but I also think it’s a bad idea. I say that because I would like to know what I’m getting before Christmas just so I could tell them if I like it or not. I don’t really like getting those shirts and PJs that I’ll never wear. So it helps out on that but I also like to be surprised with what I get. So I don’t think I would use Amazon.com to shop or let others shop on there for my things because it just ruins the moment of opening the presents because you already know what it is.
I believe that this idea is innovative, but is too blunt to the person who has their gift rejected. They spent time looking for a gift and because you don't like it they have to find a new gift while feeling that the recipient doesn't really like the gifts you give him/her. The actual idea is useful and saves money for the recipient of the gift, but hurts the relationship between the recipient and the sender. Also I believe that surprise is not necessarily good. If they got me a gift I really want, I’m going to be excited about it even if I know what it is. Overall, Amazon has a good idea but they need to put more thought into the process of it.
ReplyDeleteRyan Haines
Period 2
Sean Nelson
ReplyDelete3rd Period
I think that this new idea Amazon has its advantages, but also its disadvantages. I agree with Jerry in that it is an effective way to get whatever it is that you bought for someone to them, but it kind of does ruin a part of the holidays. A lot of people enjoy going shopping for their family and friends and spending the time to do it and this just isn't the same. On the other hand, they don't have to shop online if they don't want to. Also the holidays aren't just about gifts, so if you put all that aside, the holiday season is just as good as ever.
This proposal by Amazon is smart but at the same time it ruins the whole holiday season. It‘s smart because if you don’t like the gift you can return it with out hurting the value of the object. But, at the same time it is very impractical because if somebody bought you something at least be respectful and appreciate the idea. Finally, the whole part of the holiday season is to be with family and even if you did not get the thing you always wanted be respectful and keep the item.
ReplyDeleteAbin Joes
ReplyDeletePeriod 2
Even though this new idea makes gift giving as simple as it could be, it makes the recipient lose interest in it unless, of course, they absolutely crave it. Like the themes in many unsuccessful movies, happiness is the pursuit of happiness, and if you already know what you are going to get, the pursuit is over thus making the recipient unhappy. But this idea benefits human need to make everything in life easier for them.
Ervin Ricasio
ReplyDeletePeriod 5
I think this would be a great idea. It’s a way for people to save their money. If someone gets a present and really doesn’t like it, it would become a waste, and the present would be useless. I don’t shop on Amazon, but I think it is a great idea and would be very useful to other people. I know it may ruin the Christmas spirit, but it’s a great way to keep your house clear of unwanted gifts, not to be mean or anything.
Ervin Ricasio
ReplyDeletePeriod 5
I think this would be a great idea. It’s a way for people to save their money. If someone gets a present and really doesn’t like it, it would become a waste, and the present would be useless. I don’t shop on Amazon, but I think it is a great idea and would be very useful to other people. I know it may ruin the Christmas spirit, but it’s a great way to keep your house clear of unwanted gifts, not to be mean or anything.
I believe that Amazon's new idea is actually really great. Some people are just totally blonde when it comes to giving gifts. And even if that's not the case, everybody has different tastes. I remember when I used to get presents that I didn't really like. I knew that gift giving was still kind and I appreciated it, but I really could have gotten something better. With Amazon's new gift policy, I believe that Christmas will be twice as fun for everybody. Tis the season to be giving, so let's get them stuff they like.
ReplyDeleteMatthew Louis
ReplyDelete6th
I agree with Jade. What Amazon is doing is a really good thing. Because you don't want to give somebody a gift they aren't going to use, and you don't want to receive the wrong gift either. So in all this was a really great idea by Amazon that other Businesses should look into for the Future.
Alvin Mei
ReplyDelete2nd Period
I think what Amazon is trying to do, is wrong. Although it is nice to see a present you get beforehand, it is also ruining the spirit of Christmas. The people receiving their gifts shouldn't be selfish and should accept it because their elders took out the time to choose, and buy it for them. In response to Nick Mathai, your sister is only in 1st grade, and of course she cries because she haven't understood why the elders give the dolls to her, for older and mature people, they should accept their gifts and not complain. If everybody would stop expecting so much from Christmas gifts, and think about the little things, then companies won't have to deal with expenses of labor.
Aileen Nguyen
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
In general, Amazon's idea is decent, but I don't think it's right if a person finds out what they're going to get by email. In addtion to that, the fact that they can choose not to receive the gift is wrong. If a person wanted to give you a gift, they obviously took the time to go out and buy it, and the recipient should be grateful enough that the giver actually thought about them. On the other hand, if the gift is something that the receiver would find, in any way, offensive or obnoxious, then I guess it would be okay to reject it.
I think this is a great idea. Amazon's new procedure will make gift giving a much more efficient process. People will no longer have to stare at those unwanted pink bunny pajamas. Personally, I do not receive gifts from Amazon. The change would not affect my Christmas now, but it might in the future.
ReplyDeleteAlex Cyriac
Emily Panozzo
ReplyDelete4th period
As innovative as this is, I'm not completely set on the idea. The
concept is great when one thinks of the money they will save by not
having to go through numerous shipping processes, but this makes me
question the kind of people buying from Amazon or any other online
stores. A gift is a gift. Poor Great Granny (even though it is highly
unlikely she even knows of such online markets) could be just buying
something she thought was perfect for you! It is from the bottom of her
heart and people have the nerve to cancel and exchange! Maybe I'm
overreacting but it just doesn't seem fair. Why not just donate that
polka dotted night gown to someone who could find a use for it like
Goodwill.
Victoria Hackney
ReplyDelete2nd Period
I understand that people do not want to receive a gift they don’t like, or simply have no use for it, but shouldn’t you be appreciative of a gift at all. If you are giving someone a gift it isn’t going to be just because you know them, but rather because you are close friends with that person and know the person. If you know the person well enough you should have an idea as to what kind of thing they would want, and if you really just can’t decide ask the person. That way they understand that you are trying but just are having a difficult time. The idea Amazon has is that you can just simply reject a gift and get yourself something better is just selfish and ruins the whole gift giving idea. Gift giving shouldn’t just be about what is being given but the thought behind it that counts. I don’t know about you but I also would feel guilty rejecting someone’s gift.
I agree with this idea. If I give someone a gift, I would want it to be useful. That gift should not become a burden for the person or a permanent resident inside his closet. The fact that the gift is loved by the receiver brings more meaning to this event. However, I also agree that it's the thought that matters the most.
ReplyDeleteSteffie Philip
Period-6th
I understand that Amazon wants to do the good thing and all, but if you spend tons of time looking for a gift and want it to be "special" also make it a surprise and the receiver gets a e-mail saying you got a gift that in Amazon's opinion was bad then we have a problem. I appreciate what they are trying to do but they didn't really keep in mind how the sender feels.
ReplyDeleteJaison Mathew
ReplyDelete4th Period
I think this has a good side and a bad side. Most of the time we pretty much tell our parents what we want for christmas. Lots of times our friends know too, but sometimes we also get gifts that we don't want or already have. I would feel sort of sad if I rejected a gift that someone probably sent a while looking for. The person who was trying to get the right gift for you would probably feel bad that you didn't like or want their gift either. Personally, I would rather get a gift card, gift certificate, or just money, because then I can get something I want.
Jeffrey Jhingree
ReplyDelete4th period
I think that people working for Amazon think that this is a good idea. This will save them time on having to rewrap another gift and it would also save them money. Like many who have commented on this article, people who do not work for Amazon and I would disagree with the idea. They would not want the person who they are getting the gift for to see what they are receiving. The people who are buying the gift want it to be a surprise when they open it.
Kyne Onyenze
ReplyDelete3rd Period
I don't see why people would even think about returning a gift that someone else gave up the time and money to buy for you. That's just outright ridiculous. It means someone was thinking of you. Personally, I don't think Amazon should send an email to the recipient of the gift telling them what they got to see whether they like it or not and decide whether or not they would like to stop the tansaction before it even ships out the factory. That's rude and unrespectful. I remember my parents always used to tell me and still do is "Never be picky and just be thankful that they thought of you cause not everyone is as blessed as you are."
Samantha Twardowski
ReplyDelete3rd Period
I believe that Amazon is doing am amazing job with all the gifts and shipments. I can't imagine how many items are bought from Amazon in a day and to think about how long it takes the company to get everything shipped is even worse. I don't know how Amazon would be able to get their shipments out faster, so I think they are doing a great job with exchanges and returns as well.
John Gann
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
This amazon return policy as stated by others ruins the spirt of Christmas and the classic nostalgia of Christmas morning. Also the “gift of re-gifting” and the other classic Christmas cliches wouldn't occur. This new generation of Christmas will only ruin.
I think this is a good idea on the part of Amazon. It does ruin the suprise, but if you get something you don't like, you would be pretty angry. I am usually weary of buying items online because I'm afraid that I will get something that doesn't meet my standards. Also for the people making the products and trying to send them, it will be easier to know what the person wants. I really don't see the bad side to this idea.
ReplyDeleteHamza R.
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
It's a nice idea that Amazon can save money and help out the customer. Though it might mess with the holiday season it can make our lives a lot easier rather then looking at someone's face and make them feel dissapointed. Emailing them is kind of bad, but if it is anonymous then it might not be. So it could be a good or bad idea depending on how a person looks at it, but personally I don't mind.
Tyler Powers 5th Period
ReplyDeleteThis to me ruins the whole point of the holiday season. A reason behind this is because the gifts you get you should keep for the idea behind. Even if it is not ideal the thought is what matters. But for Amazon, it is a good idea because they would not be losing as much money if the item was received then returned. In conclusion it's a very smart business plan for Amazon but it takes away from the whole meaning of the holiday season.
I think Amazons idea is good but it does have its ups and downs. Receiving gifts from someone should be accepted whether you like it or not because it is coming from the heart. But there are times, when you get items that you really don't need or want. At these circumstances, Amazons idea comes in handy.
ReplyDeleteBailey Banks
ReplyDelete6th Period
I don't think that being able to see what you are receiving is right; it defeats the whole purpose of gift giving. Seeing the item before one receives it shouldn't be important, then it wouldn't be a true gift. It would basically be summarized as one using someone else's money to get something that they want other than what they were given. This is very ungrateful and could hurt the sender’s feelings, when all they were doing was thinking about you.
I think it is not fair for the recipient to know what his relative wanted to send him and reject the gift. It is surely very unpleasing. There must be an online based gift sending program that provides a certificate as well. It does not feel good for the sender if the recipient rejects the gift. Amazon was very skillful in having such splendid ideas, but certain alterations could be made to adjust the emotional situations that could be formed from this purticular act.
ReplyDeleteAman Gupte
ReplyDeletePeriod 6
I think Amazon’s idea is great, but it can also be hurtful to the gift givers. I like the idea that if you don’t like the gift, you could say no to it. You still have to think about what the person who gave you the gift will feel when they find out that you rejected whatever they worked so hard on picking out for you. Say if my grandma gave a gift and I didn’t like, I would still keep it knowing that she means well and it would be something that I could remember her by. I still think that this idea is great, but I also think that it could be used in other ways.
Wow ! Amazon was very smart in bringing this idea into market. I am sure there will be improvements made to this idea. According to now, I feel it is an awesome concept. All people do not have the same taste. One might like guns whereas others love Barbie dolls. So the recipient has the power to not accept something that he/she dislikes. In doing so, the sender can send this gift to another person which otherwise will the recipient have to accept this gift unhappily and complain about it for the whole day.
ReplyDeleteDane Gantt
ReplyDeletePeriod 2
Well, this idea can go good or bad. Maybe someone will see that the gift that they are receiving is something that they would rather not receive, which could possibly save the gift giver's money.
Andremarie Jean
ReplyDelete2nd Period
I am on border line with this one. Its a bad thing and I disagree because they are totally going against really the meaning of getting a gift. Which is totally fine because its different for some then it is to me. Also it can be a good ideal for giving back that one gift that you know you probably should have not gotten. For intance if you got a shirt or some pants that really don't fit understandable. You just really have to think and put yourself in the person's shoes that gave you the gift, and what were they thinking when they bought it.
Merin Mathew
ReplyDeleteperiod 6
I can relate to people not getting the gift they expect. But I wouldn’t tell them I hate the present because I only care that they decided to waste precious time and money to give a present to me. By the way, Amazon.com is only thinking about saving money and nothing more than that. I really don't like buying stuff on the internet. I mean I rather buy things at stores or make gifts myself.
3rd Period
ReplyDeleteI understand what Amazon is trying to do with its new patent, but some people prefer their gifts a suprise. I have to agree with Howe that sending the right gift the first time is important. Just because someone has a record of delivering unwanted gifts, that doesn't mean that the suprise should be ruined.
Samantha Martin
ReplyDelete4th Period
I'm not sure if I like Amazon's idea. Sure it would be great to know what your going to get before you get it, but it sort of ruins the surprise and takes the fun out of everything. Also, even if you happen to get a gift from a family member or a friend that you didn't like, shouldn't it be the thought that counts? I mean at least they took some time out of their day to get you something.
Stephen Castillo
ReplyDelete4th Period
I think its a great idea to know whats inside the Amazon box before you get it. What would happen if your family member bought you a really nice computer from Amazon, and when you open it theres a set of plates. "Well its the thought that counts." Being able to know what there sending you is a better way to conserve time and money, on both Amazon and your side.
K'Vonna Johnson
ReplyDelete5th period
I like but then I dislike that Amazon came up with this incredible idea. I like it because it could come in handy sometimes and not a lot of people have probably thought of doing this before. I dislike the fact that this is showing the gifts. Gifts are supposed to be surprises no matter what the present is or the cost. It's the thought that really counts in the end not the gift. Right???
Leslie Vazhappilly
ReplyDeletePeriod 4
I think that its wrong for amazon to send the receiver an email about what gift they are about to get. It ruins the surprise of giving the gift. I completely agree with this statement, because a gift's is not about what in the inside, but show that the person actually cares about you and take time to buy the gift and give it to you. Getting a gift, is better than not getting one at all. I also see it as a good thing because if you don't want a gift you can return it and get some thing you like. But that ruins the surprise and excitement, when you get up at Christmas morning and open all you gifts.
Joe James
ReplyDelete6th Period
Amazon's idea really isn't all that bad but they could make some minor tweaks here and there so that the giver wouldn't feel that bad. I think that Amazon should find a way where you can return the gift without notifying the giver. Sure, you might have to pay to ship it back but who cares? It's certainly better than having a cool gift that you might not like just sitting there for nothing.
I think it a great idea what Amazon came up with! I think the consumer should look at what they are getting themselves into before they actually buy it. I understand people want it to be a surprise, but I think the adult should look into what they want for their kids. On the other hand, I don't think the buyer should send it back just because they don't want it. I think Amazon is a great company and whatever problems they might have, they can fix it.
ReplyDelete- Justin Johnson
6 period
Raphael Laran
ReplyDelete5th Period
As usual, I have a positive and negative thought on most of these articles. Amazon has a pretty good system, letting the person who got the gift returning for something that they want, but like what my parents taught me, you should never sell or give back a gift because it's the thought that counts. I'd say that overall Amazon's system is untraditional in my point of view. In my huge family, gifts mean nothing when it comes to parties or Christmas. Its about caring about one another and spending time with each other. We might get what we want or maybe not, but in the end, we are thankful of those that care.
6th period
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with the people above who said that Amazon is basically destroying the fun part of Christmas, when they tell the recipient what their relative or loved one got them. I can understand when people don’t get you exactly what you want for Christmas, but it’s the thought that counts, right? Just be happy that someone was actually thinking about you.If it were me buying the gift, I would be devastated since I spend hours looking for a perfect gift for my friend and they just rejected it. As the people stated above, Amazon has good intentions but they should do something else then telling someone what they got for Christmas.
Grace Bonojo
ReplyDelete4th period
I think this plan to a quickly return gift before even getting them is horrible. There's a saying that "It's the thought that counts." Whatever happened to that? As a society we've already become materialistic. Now there's a program to help you express that materialistic trait, which is said, because in the long run our society will become worse off than it is now. It's sad that someone would decide to return a gift that came from the heart. If I got an ugly sweater from my grandmother I'd cherish it because she's dead now. You should appreciate what you get and what you have because you might not have it tomorrow.
Grace Bonojo
ReplyDelete4th period
I think this plan to a quickly return gift before even getting them is horrible. There's a saying that "It's the thought that counts." Whatever happened to that? As a society we've already become materialistic. Now there's a program to help you express that materialistic trait, which is said, because in the long run our society will become worse off than it is now. It's sad that someone would decide to return a gift that came from the heart. If I got an ugly sweater from my grandmother I'd cherish it because she's dead now. You should appreciate what you get and what you have because you might not have it tomorrow.
Amazon is smart in a way. They wouldn't want anyone's paid items to be damaged, so they would inform the person if it is damaged, right? It's better to have a suitable item or present and know about it before hand rather than a broken object just show up at your mailbox. I think what Amazon is trying to do is pretty nice, even though it sort of ruins the surprise.
ReplyDelete4th Period
ReplyDeleteI don't think I like the Amazon idea very much. It would be great to know what you are getting, but that ruins the surprise of the gift. It takes away the meaning of gift-giving. Sometimes we all get gifts we don't like, but in the long run it is the thought that counts. If you receive something you don't like, or doesn't fit, there is the option for return or exchange, which to me is better in the long run. If someone went to the trouble of getting me a gift I would say thank you and later if it is something I didn't like or didn't fit I would return it on my own if that is possible